Press Statement March 24th
There has been much commentary, some inaccurate, in mainstream and social media in recent days, concerning responses given by Archbishop Diarmuid Martin to a question at a public meeting which he addressed in Dublin last week, in particular in relation to freedom of conscience. Please see below a transcript of Archbishop Martins words, in which he limited his comments to the broad issue of freedom of conscience, without making any specific proposals, in the context of the upcoming referendum.
“I think freedom of conscience is probably one of the most very fundamental of all human rights, because it touches the very depths of a person in their identity and we have to redevelop a sensitivity to what that means.
We look, for example, to totalitarian regimes and the difficulties people had to express their freedom of conscience and the courage many people had to do that. And in many ways, even in the very repressive regimes, there were some people of courage who were not afraid to raise their voices. They’re the ones who will be remembered; they are the ones who will have changed society.
Here, we have and in this I agree, not just in the media, but in political culture, there is a culture of sound bites, a culture of quick answers, of one liners which doesn’t foster this idea of people being able to reflect, express and develop their conscience.
We have problems and we have seen it in the inconsistency, for example somebody said “religious solemnisers won’t be forced to celebrate gay marriages.” Now what is that saying? It’s saying, ‘OK there is a conscientious question and we respect the conscience of religious solemnisers; mainly priests. What about a Christian in civil society; a lay Christian who has the same difficulties? Does he have freedom of conscience? Or is his freedom of conscience different to mine as a priest? I don’t believe that. Ok, now people will say if you are paid by the State, you have to do what the State tells you. That isn’t in the long term….that isn’t even what democracy is about. So, I do believe we have to stress that.
The other side is that we have to respect the freedom of expression of others who may disagree with us, but I think this question of freedom of conscience is being pushed aside in debate and we are getting very superficial answers about the way it is being addressed in our society, and I believe that is a much more serious problem.
I have been noticing more and more in my travels and in my reflections a real dissatisfaction and uncertainty about politics. People are losing confidence in the political process. It is because politicians and political parties are becoming more and more insensitive to the way people are thinking and they are not carrying out this process of mediation between the needs of the community and the views and desires of citizens. When we move into that type of politics, I believe society is being damaged. I believe that respect for conscience is a way that politics shows its respect for the citizens who built up that. And I believe that in the area of freedom of conscience, freedom of religious expression is also one of the most fundamental rights that have to be preserved.” ENDS